White Paper Polio – Bill Brooks

I have chosen to write about if the vaccine should be mandatory based on the fact that it actually infects about one in three million people instead of curing them (oral vaccine only).  After a quick google search I found a link to a CBS news article written in 2009 about some of the dangers that the polio vaccine itself carries.  This particular column was dedicated to the evaluation claim that the oral vaccine was not worth taking.  The article detailed how an outbreak caused from the vaccine can be more dangerous than a “naturally occurring” outbreak because of its ability to mutate into a more devastating virus.  At the time this article was written there were seven documented cases of the vaccine causing such outbreaks.

In this light, I do not think it fair to force the vaccine (especially the oral vaccine) on anyone.  Although the certain tribes may seem overly paranoid to people living in more industrialized countries we must remember that this is their culture and it should be respected.  The one in three million does seem to hold a very low possibility but most lotteries have significantly lower probabilities and many still choose to buy a ticket, so we should we not expect that some people might not want to tempt fate in a similar manner.

Total eradication of the polio disease does seem like an incredible thing but we need to realize the cost of doing something as radical as forcing people in places like Africa and other developing countries to take the vaccine is too high.  We cannot force people to do something that they view as immoral or dangerous even if it appears to be nonsensical.  A common practice in the United States is Jehovah’s Witnesses refusing to accept blood transfusions, even if it will save their lives because they believe it is wrong, this moral is upheld in our society even though to some it may seem odd.  The idea of “crop dusting” over certain tribes might seem good in theory but the hardship that it most certainly will cause is not worth it.

 

Edit: added link

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/14/health/main5242168.shtml

This entry was posted in White Paper Polio. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to White Paper Polio – Bill Brooks

  1. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    I appreciate your passionate defense of the right of people to determine for themselves whether or not to take preventive medicine, Bill, but primarily I was looking for new sources with valuable evidence to support conclusions, not so much for the conclusions themselves. I’m much more interested in whether your source material supports your conclusions than what those conclusions are.

    Therefore, be very careful how you evaluate the source material. You say the oral vaccine infects about one in three million people. Is that accurate, or does it cause paralysis in about one in three million people?

    Is it accurate to say the column evaluated whether the vaccine was “worth taking,” or did it evaluate whether the vaccine’s obvious benefits were worth the risk of accidental paralysis?

    (Your lottery analogy is interesting here. The lottery has only one winner per three million participants and the risk is a dollar. The vaccine has three million winners for whom the prize is health and one loser for whom the risk is paralysis.)

    Did the article detail how “an outbreak caused from the vaccine” is dangerous, or did it detail how the symptoms occuring in a single individual are dangerous? (An outbreak, in the case of communicable diseases, means lots of new cases and the danger of an epidemic.)

    At the time the article was written, were there seven documented cases of the vaccine causing widespread outbreaks, or seven documented cases of paralyzed individuals?

    You may be right, Bill; I just want to encourage respect for accuracy.

    Grade Posted.

    Like

Leave a reply to davidbdale Cancel reply