Definition Essay- Sam Sarlo

In June 1971, President Richard Nixon declared a “war on drugs.” This movement has been fundamentally flawed since the very inception of its name, and it has accumulated more human casualties than many wars against enemy nations. His actions were sparked by a steady increase in drug use and drug arrests through the 1960’s, and surely his purpose was to lessen the damage done to the people of our nation by drugs and drug-related violence, but unfortunately it has led to massive bloodshed and sustained international organized crime. Thus far, our government has spent trillions of dollars and the lives of tens of thousands of citizens on regulations and enforcement measures that have been at best ineffective and wasteful and at worst dangerous and counterproductive. As I have mentioned in my previous posts, the number of drug-related deaths has fairly steadily increased since the inception of the war on drugs.

There are several categories of drug-related deaths, but the two main categories are overdoses and drug-related violence. There are people killed by drug users, drug users killed by police, police killed by drug users/dealers, drug dealers killing each other in territorial disputes, drug-funded gangs killing each other, and that’s not even considering what’s happening outside U.S. borders. Counterintuitively, the war on drugs actually causes more drug-related deaths to occur. It seems that the harder our government tries and the more money they spend to enforce drug laws, the more people die.An extremely low estimate of drug related deaths in this country for 2007 is 15,223 (Richardson). As I said, this is an extremely low estimate, it even excludes the roughly 60% of overdose deaths caused by prescription drugs. About 6,487 (Richardson) of these deaths are caused by drug-related violence.

Most drug violence is rooted in and perpetuated by the war on drugs and the legislation on which it is based. Our government has regulated drugs through prohibition since the 1930’s, and it has not and will never work. Just as the failed experiment of alcohol prohibition created massive black-market enterprises and put money in the pockets of violent criminals, the  war on drugs has only worsened and deepened the drug problem. The drug trade is simply an issue of supply and demand. Our government currently employs mostly supply-oriented efforts, such as arresting drug dealers and going after cartel leaders in Mexico. The harsh reality is that there will always be a huge demand for drugs in this country, and as long as drugs are prohibited here they will be supplied illegally from somewhere.

The only way we can hope to remedy the drug problem and save tens of thousands of lives from drug violence is legalization and regulation of drugs. Other drugs should be treated just like alcohol, legally available to adults, quality controlled by the government, and regulated in their usage. This type of legislation would effectively crash the value of drugs and eliminate demand for illegal foreign drugs. No drug user would want to buy illegal drugs from some shady guy in an alley when he could simply go to a government-regulated store and buy drugs of guaranteed and  consistent quality and purity without risking arrest and jail time. With no demand for illegal drugs, drug violence would nearly disappear. Drug dealers would be put out of business, police wouldn’t have to arrest responsible users, and the Mexican cartels would dwindle significantly. Regulation of legal drugs would also dramatically decrease the number of overdose deaths. Many overdoses happen because drug users don’t know the quality or purity of the substances they are obtaining, so they have no standard on which to base their dosage. Like alcohol, legal drugs could be required to label their potency so that the user can make an informed decision based on real knowledge of exactly what he is putting into his body.

While the benefits of legalization are very clear to me, I realize that it will not solve the whole drug problem. People will still die of overdoses, and drug addicts will still commit crimes, possibly violent ones, to feed their habit. Using a small fraction of the money that we currently spend on the war on drugs, we could fund a comprehensive drug treatment program to help people overcome their addictions, or at least a better version of the current methadone clinic program that gives addicts enough to keep them sane and sated.

WORKS CITED:

-http://drugwarfacts.org

-http://www.esquire.com/the-side/richardson-report/drug-war-facts-090109
“A Radical Solution to End the Drug War: Legalize everything” by John H. Richardson

This entry was posted in x Definition Essay. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Definition Essay- Sam Sarlo

  1. davidbdale says:

    Hey, Sam. You’re in rare form here!
    “As I have mentioned in my previous posts . . . .”! I like the boisterous stomping across the material, but referring to your earlier essays is outside the scope of this academic essay. Save it for your own blog. 🙂

    Please decide whether the war on drugs of which you speak includes efforts to reduce the abuse of prescription drugs. If it does (and it might; the government spends money on those efforts), you don’t have to apologize for the portion of the death total attributable to their abuse. (But maybe you mean that government efforts to reduce these deaths does not increase the number of deaths the way other efforts do.) Either way, decide how to handle those numbers that doesn’t sound like an apology and does your argument some good.

    You mean “there will always be a huge demand for drugs in this country, and as long as that demand is not met legally, criminals will step in to satisfy that demand.”

    You drift so quickly from your definition of the war on drugs to the remedy of legalization that it’s hard to tell what will be left to do in your longer paper, Sam. Is it not possible you’ve left out some valuable material (about the costs in manpower? about the lives wasted in jail? about the miscarriages of justice?) that demonstrates some of the other casualties of this war and make a better analogy to combat war?

    I’d rather see that in your later paragraphs than a race to finish the paper in a hurry.

  2. davidbdale says:

    Evan Horner found a source you’ll find useful, Sam. Be sure to share with him too if you find something he needs.
    http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s