Safer Saw-Nana Cao

  1. Wec says his permanent and “traumatic injury” could have been prevented if Bosch and its competitors had not rejected and fought against the safety technology
  2. Wec claims that if the safety technology was adopted and in use then he would not be seriously injured by table saw.
  3. This is an evaluation claim.
  4. This claim is accuracy.  From the demonstration by Gass testing his own finger on the SawStop, the table saw did stop and there are not even a sign of red on his finger.  This provides support to Wec’s claim that with use of SawStop he would not be injured.  It is reasonable to other people because people would not want to be injured, if there is some way to prevent this from happening.  This claim is persuasive.  It pursue people to take action to demand use of SawStop so serious injures will not happen.
This entry was posted in X Stop Saw. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Safer Saw-Nana Cao

  1. davidbdale says:

    This is clearer than your support of Taylor, the Girl Scout, Nana. Using fewer words is a good strategy for you! 🙂
    Grade Recorded

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s