biggarz-self reflection

  1. Core Value I: Understand that writing is a practice that involves a multi-stage, recursive, and social process. (In particular, students should address how they have engaged in self-directed revision.)

This was beaten into my brain not only this year but since I have been writing essays. It is crazy that no matter how many times you change something it isn’t always perfect. This course really showed how important the writing process is. We wrote three mini essays and each one we had to revise.

2.  Core Value II. Understand that close and critical reading/analysis allows writers to understand how and why texts create meaning.

This was done with the visual rhetoric assignment. The understanding to really look closely at things like short videos and picking each second of it and analyzing what it means.

3. Core Value III. Understand that writing is shaped by audience, purpose, and context.

This I feel is an extremely important skill to have not just in writing, but in life. Before an interview or something of importance make sure you know the audience and why you are saying what you are saying. For the course it is easy, every paper we write the audience is always the teacher.

4. Core Value IV. Understand the role of information literacy in the practice of writing.

One big thing about research papers is reading. Reading and understanding what you read is extremely important for when you want to communicate it with your audience. For example one should understand his sources before using it in the paper.

5. Core Value V. Understand the ethical dimensions of writing.

Writing is a powerful tool. It can be perceived in many ways and have endless combinations with words. However you have to have great responsibility with it meaning no plagiarism and making sure everything has the correct citations.

Posted in biggarz, Portfolio Biggarz, Reflective | Leave a comment

Definition Rewrite- Jets1313

High Profile Lawyers: Their Role in and Unbalanced Criminal Justice System

High profile lawyers and an unbalanced criminal justice system coinside with each other. Our justice system is one that needs a tramendous amount of work especially when it comes to wealth discrimination. However, this form of discrimination starts with the lawyers. Celebrities will obviously achieve to obtain the best lawyer they can find when being accused of a crime. The average person is already at a disadvantage because lawyers that are not public defenders can cost thousands of dollars. Lawyers of high stature cause a ripple in our system because they have been known to find legitimate ways to keep their clients out of jail. They also are known to simaltaneously use shameless self promotion when in the media for their own benefit. These methods that they use are another reason the justice system is plumetting. There is a criminal justice system for the average person, and then a completely different one for high class people, and that is something that needs to be changed in this country.

High profile lawyers primerily take cases that involve celebrities, this means that they are paid more generously by their clients. High profile lawyers by definition are well-respected lawyers of higher notoriety in our justice system, that are able to gain media attention and are only available to people with a lot of money. Usually, the only clientele that can afford this type of lawyer is also of a higher profile or is wealthy. As explained in an article written by H. Patrick Furman called “Publicity in High Profile Criminal Cases”, these lawyers also have connections and power in the media that is higher than that of a public defender. This means that a client of higher status may have more options and plea deals at the time of sentencing because a jury may have formed an opinion influenced by a tabloid. This will allow an unfair trial to take place for the client, possibly because of the lawyers’ reputation. Lawyers of this stature do not typically use legitimate strategies when it comes to defending and keeping their clients out of jail. However, this is tolorated because the lawyer may once again have a favorable reputation. Winning the case is the ideal situation for these lawyers. However, one of the most important things about representing a celebrity for a lawyer is the exposure they get afterwars. This exposure can be very beneficial to the lawyer. It is also explained in the article by Furman that “it seemed that the lawyers spent more time in front of the camera than in front of the bench. Ironically, after the trial, half of the lawyers got their own television shows.” This proves the definition above, and leaves you wondering if money is the only motivation for these lawyers.

The criminal justice system has never and will never have a perfectly balanced system based on two things, guilty and not guilty. In the more recent years, it seems that the justice system has gotten better at trying to be fair and serve justice where it is needed. Unfortunately, one of the setbacks to the development of an equal justice system is that not all people have access to the same kind of defense from a lawyer. People who are wealthy are beginning to have an easier time in court. Many people who are accused of committing a crime have to make use of the public defender they are given. What many dont know is that public defenders take on a lot oof cases at once since they are not paid as much, and this is not fair considering that their clients case is not getting enough attention for it to be successful. An unbalanced criminal justice system is a system by which the courts treat a person differently than they treat other people because of their status. According to an article titled “Celebrity Justice” by John Gibeaut “advocates say today’s unmatched effort at secrecy cheats the public out of its First Amendment right to observe and criticize the system through its surrogates in the press. Ideally, public oversight is supposed to keep the system honest.” Also, if a person is of a higher status it should be expected by themselves and whoever is representing them that it is inevitable that the case will somehow get into the media. A low profile case may not end up in the media and all over tabloids, but, that does not mean that the infromation is not public. It seems that the advantages for wealthy people are endless, while the disadvantages for the average person keep piling up on the other end. John Gilbeaut thinks that this type of separation helps to “[create] the appearance of a two-tiered justice system-one for celebrities and the other for everyone else-media”. It is further explained that our justice system is unbalanced and unjust when it comes to higher profile cases. It should not matter who you are, no alligations should be ignored and everyone should be held accountable for their actions.

It is not difficult to understand that high profile lawyers find their way around the system. Their methods are known to be unlawful and discriminatory, they are also known for gaining a lot of media attention while representing someone that everyone knows. It is unclear what the motive behind their work actually is. It is entirely possible that high profile lawyers are only defending a majority of these people because they are wealthy. I can not think of a case where a high profile lawyer did something or represented someone that did not have a lot of money. Also, people of the lower and middle class a lot of the time do not have access to these kinds of lawyers, therefore they do no get the same type of representation. Everyone should be able to get the same type of representation, without wealth discrimination and no one should be above the law. That is what is wrong with our criminal justice system today.

References

Gibeaut, J. (2005). Celebrity justice. ABA Journal, 91(1), 43-49.

Furman, H. (1998). Publicity in high profile criminal cases. St. Thomas Law Review, 10(3), 507-536.

Posted in Definition Rewrite, jets, Portfolio Jets1313 | Leave a comment

biggarz-visual rhetoric

0:00

I see nothing too special. Smokey the bear as an animoji, some kids smiling, a tent, a forest of pine trees to the left and regular trees on the right. Grass looks dry and dead like winter is approaching. Same with the trees

0:01

Bear starts to talk. Background has no change kids are now gone.

0:02

Background remains the same still. Bear is not actually smokey it is Steven Colbert. Bear winks.

0:03-0:06

Balloons show up. 75 year anniversary for smokey the bear. Voice goes to smokey and says his famous line. Back to Colbert after though.

0:07-0:10

Still Steven Colbert as Smokey. Bear is still centered and the main focus. Background is blurred out.

0:11-0:14

Kids and tent are back. They look happy then automatically sad after Smokey says 90% of wildfires are started by us humans

0:15-0:16

Going on about wildfires

0:17

Grill pops up. Dumping leftover coals can be harmful.

0:18-0:21

Blaming the fires on humans still. “We started the fire.” Fire emojis around the grass

0:22-0:26

Still the fire emojis. They’re gone back to only smokey. Now saying he loves trees no matter the scented kinds or coniferous.

0:27-0:30

No more animoji. Now it is just a graphic of smokey holding his balloon for 75 years being alive. Brown background. Has patches for the foundations

My experience with this video was overall a good one. It was pretty simple to understand and the message was very clear. I personally thought that this video was a great example of all three. However, it was more along the lines of pathos because it appealed to emotions mostly being bright and fun. However getting acoss an important message.

Posted in biggarz, Portfolio Biggarz, Visual Rewrite | Leave a comment

biggarz-bib

Vaughn, N. (2018, Apr 23). Higher minimum wage has pros, cons. Press & Sun-Bulletin

Background:

Simply put this was a newspaper article that weighs the pros and cons of the minimum wage raise. It takes place in New York and gives great information on both sides of the argument. For example gives stats and even quotes from Anthony Cuomo who put this bill into effect.

How I used it:

I used this article in both the pro and con way. However it was mainly used for my rebuttal essay for proving that money is what drives people and also arguing that Cuomo is giving ‘false hope’ in a way

Loriggio, P. (2017, Jul 22). Minimum wage pros, cons argued. Waterloo Region Record

Background:

Like the first source this is the groundwork for the argument. Giving extra information about bills and how people reacted. Also a big part of the bill was to raise the wage value to $15 per hour and having it slowly come into effect over the years.

How I used it:

I used it to show a simple quote, but which had meaning saying that this is already in action. It was a call to help. Emotional appeal.

Boudreaux, D. J. (2018, Jul 27). Minimum wage & technology. Tribune – Review / Pittsburgh Tribune – Review

Background:

Technology is in everything today and it really controls our lives. Whether it being the phones or the internet its all over. Well now technology has evolved and is now taking your jobs

How I used it:

This was mainly my most useful article or at least one of. It helped me prove the truth of self serving kiosks at McDonald’s and also how they are cheaper to maintain than a worker making minimum wage.

Binkley, A. (2018, Feb 20). Ontario sheds 51,000 part-time jobs in january; pace of minimum wage increase in spotlight after major part-time job losses.Ontario Farmer

Background:

This article focuses on the unemployment factors of the cons list. Farmers or people who are self employed have no need to worry however, it was the private sector jobs that were at risk

How it was used:

Used it to prove my point of how scary unemployment can increase. If not now then in the long run it’ll increase a boatload

Sawchuk, J. (2015, Mar 31). Minimum wage increase creates unemployment.Alberni Valley Times

Background:

This was a very simple article which main focus was to prove how real this is and give real world examples based on the numbers. Can’t disagree with those facts.

How it was used:

I used it in a way to form my first reason and branch off of that. Giving unemployment its number one best reason. Also i used it to prove inflation is a cause of raising the minimum wage.

Lee, C. E. (2014, Oct 02). Obama outlines economic case ahead of midterms; president calls for policies such as raising minimum wage, extending unemployment benefits. Wall Street Journal (Online)

Background:

With the midterm elections coming Obama was prepared to make his speech. Which included the ideas for a ‘plan’ to raise the minimum wage.

How I used it:

Although some phrases were paraphrased and no direct quotes were taken out, it was a good pool of knowledge to have to get a view of a very well respected man.

Brown, Charles; Gilroy, Curtis; and Kohen, Andrew. “The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Employment and Unemployment.” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 20, No. 2 (June 1982), pp. 487-528.

Background:

This is chalk full of just different types of theories one could learn in economics class. However it is helpful as they have many different types of models and scenarios to help guide you along a certain path.

How it was used:

I used this article to gather knowledge of how economics relates to this situation. Also showed how because of the high prices to pay the workers the benefit they get out is always lower than the supply

www.dictionary.com

Background:

Dictionary

How it was used:

To define some terms and then relate those words to the phrase ‘minimum wage’

Posted in Bibliography, biggarz, Portfolio Biggarz | Leave a comment

Reflective- doorknob9

Core Values

Core Value 1. My work demonstrates that I used a variety of social and interactive practices that involve recursive stages of exploration, discovery, conceptualization, and development. ttps://rucomp2.com/2019/03/24/casual-argument-doorknob9/

This value is crucial to being a successful writer and shows development in one’s work throughout the course of a piece of writing. I implemented this into my paper about Jared Goff being the worst NFC West quarterback to compete in a Super Bowl, however more specifically that he failed to compete on the biggest stage with a team assembled and given to him. Exploration is also demonstrated in this piece because points are brought up that are other factors besides Jared Goff’s play, for example the assets he was given on offense and still failed to find those players during his big game in Super Bowl 53. This core value is showed throughout my casual argument piece in all the proper ways.

Core Value 2. My work demonstrates that I read critically, and that I placed texts into conversation with one another to create meaning by synthesizing ideas from various discourse communities. https://rucomp2.com/2019/05/01/rebuttal-rewrite-doorknob9/

Reading and understanding text is one thing, but being able to apply it into your own words is what really matters when writing a piece. In this particular piece, I gathered opinions from various sources regarding the status and play of Jared Goff and multiple other players that were, and are, in his position. The sources I used compared players performances in college football to give an outlook on their early football careers and how they fared in their first couple of seasons in the NFL. I used information that I found in the sources and analyzed it in order to demonstrate the meaning of the content. They were relevant to my topic and helped improve the points I needed to make in my piece.

Core Value 3. My work demonstrates that I rhetorically analyzed the purpose, audience, and contexts of my own writing and other texts and visual arguments. https://rucomp2.com/2019/04/15/visual-rewrite-doorknob9/

Being able to clearly explain information in a formal way is a key component in writing, and in my Visual rewrite, I analyze the information I collected from the visual and explained each couple of seconds in detail. Explaining the context of a source is a very important part of a piece because it allows you to show what is going on and what you are trying to translate in to your writing. Each step was different while they were crawling and contained different situations that I analyzed and added to the visual rewrite. Knowing the meaning of what your analyzing also is very important because that is what the source is about. The purpose of my video was the importance of a father to their children and how much of an impact their presence can make.

Core Value 4: My work demonstrates that I have met the expectations of academic writing by locating, evaluating, and incorporating illustrations and evidence to support my own ideas and interpretations. https://rucomp2.com/2019/04/22/research-doorknob9/

Meeting the expectations of academic writing by locating and evaluating evidence to support my own ideas is a critical part of the writing process and is important so we can state where our ideas originated from. In my research paper, the point to be made was how Jared Goff is the worst NFC West quarterback to make it to the Super Bowl, and to prove this I needed to evaluate my sources and evidence to incorporate my ideas and interpretations. I used information from multiple sources, one being talking about how singing Goff to a large contract could hurt his team in the long run because they wouldn’t be able to sign players to other positions. The idea I capitalized on was how without the help he needed he wouldn’t be able to get where he was, being the Super Bowl.

Core Value 5. My work demonstrates that I respect my ethical responsibility to represent complex ideas fairly and to the sources of my information with appropriate citation. https://rucomp2.com/2019/05/01/rebuttal-rewrite-doorknob9/

Creating a proper citation or reference section is very important because you must respect your sources and the writers that allow you to analyze their work you base your ideas off of. In my rebuttal rewrite I used the proper in text citations and reference sheet needed to give credit where it is due. Without these sources I wouldn’t have been able to come up with the ideas I came up with and analyzing their pieces was huge because I was able to use the information I pulled out of the articles in to my own piece, which ultimately improves my paper because I have evidence I can use to support the claim that Jared Goff is the worst NFC West quarterback to make it to a Super Bowl.

Posted in doorknob, Portfolio Doorknob9, Reflective | Leave a comment

biggarz-paper

It seems counterintuitive that many people talk about minimum wage and their pay. However, many seem rather uneducated when discussing the topic. Minimum wage has been around for decades, fluctuating at different prices over the years, although has not changed its purpose. Minimum wage should not be raised so that the unemployment rates and prices of different goods stay the same and will not increase. The goal is to look at the term minimum wage and be able to  see exactly what it entails. Clearly, if one were to separate the term into two words ‘minimum’ and ‘wage,’ it could be easier to gain a better understanding.

For years the value of minimum wage has gone up and down like a rollercoaster. The economy cannot decide the exact price range of where it should stay. It seems counterintuitive that taking both definitions and putting them together in finding the “smallest” amount of money “required” to pay these people should not be such a hard task, as stated in the dictionary. Again, such simple terms, but to make it even clearer, “Minimum wage is meant for small business.” Not only does the word small show up, but there is too much complication for something that is meant to be small. What this means is the term minimum wage has gone up and gone down throughout history, don’t you think it should be time to actually set up an actual ‘minimum wage’ where there is little to no increase? At minimum, the pay should at least be set to a price where one making minimum wage is required to get paid the right amount for the effort they put into the job they are doing. Having set wages for different degrees of work has been working for years with salaries, therefore it could come of great use if that knowledge was applied to go into minimum wage and work it from the ground up. Clearly, one can understand that having a phrase that means ‘small’ or ‘least’ is the complete opposite of what it means politically. In certain parts of the world there are laws where one can not be paid below a certain amount of money, which we see here in the U.S. However it seems quite odd since wouldn’t this technically be called ‘minimum wage’ since it is the lowest point where it would be illegal for workers to get paid that? Especially when it put into consideration as though the whole meaning of minimum wage was set up as a method of the lowest amount of pay to be offered within a rather simple job. Many questions could be asked from that, however it is just a guideline and for most, if not all times, the wages that workers get paid are way above that price level. The laws state that the actual definition of minimum wage “ as the minimum amount of financial reward that a worker receives for working a specified period of time” meaning as one works a specific time you get paid per time you work. Several take the term and portray it as either the time, performance, job, or company that is being displayed within a particular job. It is truly astonishing that such a phrase, so small and simple, could have such a big impact overtime on society and the economic outlook many have regarding what they feel is the “best” way to pay employees.

Think of the first reaction you’ll have when and if the government decides to raise the minimum wage. One could just picture it, blue skies, all smiles, and not a worry in the world. Well, not quite. More like unemployment sad to say. This right here is what we the people will have to deal with. Yes, there are benefits to this, but for this situation cons outweigh the pros. Take it from Alex Binkley, an Ontario farmer, “… January employment nationally fell by 88,000. Parttime employment declined by 137,000, while full-time employment rose by 49,000. The result was the unemployment rate increased by 0.1 percent to 5.9 per cent.” Even though this takes into account all of Canada, these numbers are scary. Just alone how fast that unemployment rate went up is concerning. Usually 4% is low in the U.S, but the U.S also have ten times greater the population as Canada which should also be taken into account. Truthfully, not everything can be of benefit to one’s own needs. Not only will unemployment will go up, but the younger lower skilled workers will never get hired again. To put it in economic terms from Brown, Gilroy Kohen, “Without a minimum wage, the monopsonistic employer’s marginal cost of labor everywhere exceeds the supply price.” One could say too that the owners were overall losing profit since they would have to pay their workers more. Furthermore, the main reason why businesses open is to make profit. Even though one could argue to create new jobs, however that would be wrong.

In addition to the unemployment numbers rising, and making our countries economy look bad. Another cause of the increase of wages would be inflation. And not talking about a dramatic change in the money values, but it would be noticable. For example take gasoline. Those prices constantly fluctuate for the past couple years, and if one takes notice it has started to increase a couple cents here and there. Another example from the Alberni Valley Times, “ferry rates go up April l. Why? The union employees receive their annual two per cent wage increase April l just like they every year from 2010 to 2014. In this world, you cannot have your cake and eat it too. Want to pay top wages to union employees? Then pay higher fares. That is called life.”It is a dog eat dog world and that’s how people make money. The government is like that and when there is a chance to make money from the people they’re going to take it. With some more economic terms the businesses with monopolies will take advantage since they own all that product and increase the price if there is inflation. It is scary to think that with the poverty already in this country we still want to raise the minimum wage to something absurd like $15 an hour. Granted yes, there should be change, but there is some opportunity cost to that. As little as it may seem each cent is increased there could be a potential person trying to support a family getting let go. It is the hard truths we face today as a society.

To tie both of these things together we see that the economic cons are more likely to outweigh the pros if there’s an increase. Not saying that it should not be increased a little, however there should be a line drawn to how far one goes. Into a smaller point the use of technology will see an increase in the workforce. Take franchises for example, McDonald’s. Most if not all the workers are on minimum wage. There has been a change where the restaurants now have self serve kiosks, which means no need for cashiers, cutting most jobs. As the Pittsburgh Tribune states, “f a machine can do for a cost of 7 per hour what a worker must be paid at least 7.25 per hour to do, the machine gets the job while the worker gets unwanted leisure.” The point being is these franchises want to make profit and the first thing owners look to cut is salaries. What better way to make money and to save time is to put a machine which the owner won’t have to worry about calling out of work, etc. Just think of how much money they’d save in both the long and short run.

As years go by things change. Things that we like and dislike change just how life works. Prices for goods and services vary based on the month, year, and possibly even day. This is why many think it is necessary to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. For many it’ll be beneficial to help support their families, or even themselves in certain situations. Poverty, another big topic that has relation to minimum wage is the key reason why this is the talk. In our economy there have been talks of raising the wages to $15 per hour. In 2017 Loriggio states, “The government wrapped up nearly two weeks of public consultations on proposed legislation that would, among other things, raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, require equal pay for part-time workers and expand personal emergency leave.” As people cheer in the streets for this dramatic incline we’ll see in our pay, others weep. However now these low skilled workers can get out of poverty and start a new life. Wrong. This is just one of the misconceptions that happen with the debate of minimum wage. In full, the debate has been talked about for years. There are many pros like it will help get rid of poverty.

Poverty is a constant cycle that goes around and around, and truly never ends. One is born in it and sometimes, but barely thrives. The people in New York living in the ‘slums’ are tough people. They are hardworking and usually look for anyway to make money. Whether that be manual labor or whatever means necessary. In New York these changes are already being put in place. These increases can be seen in paychecks as soon as 2020. As Vaughn states, “”New York proudly set an example for the nation by raising the minimum wage to $15,” Cuomo said in a statement. “The fight for economic justice for our working families continues, and we won’t stop until every New Yorker is paid the fair wages they deserve.”” As bills get passed Cuomo is loving the people of New York and only promises good things. However, is it true that it is only good things to come? Not only does Cuomo make promises that maybe hard to keep, but he has hope and that is enough for people to believe. This right here is what the ‘American Dream’ is about and Cuomo is promising them that.

Another great reason why minimum wage is being raised is to tie into poverty. In a way some owners and managers have their thoughts too, “”Raising the minimum wage raises standards for all workers,” said Stuart Appelbaum, president of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, in a statement.” Not only is the raising of paychecks from the start is going to get you to work, but it will motivate you to do better work as well. This out of many things is ridiculous. Money does drive people, however when these business owners are paying these people they’re going to realize that some workers might have to go. Leaving unemployment to raise with all the other cons to that follow letting people go.

In conclusion, the term minimum wage is definitely larger than one knows it to be. Hoping now that one could understand the importance of this debate. It is a very serious matter. Between the unemployment rates rising, inflation on certain goods rising, and even technology replacing jobs. It is crazy to see all of this go down, but how important is $15 to you?

https://search.proquest.com/docview/1566929754?pq-origsite=summon

https://search.proquest.com/docview/2028825067?pq-origsite=summon

https://search.proquest.com/docview/2053403172/fulltext/2DEEEFEC6F94519PQ/1?accountid=13605

https://search.proquest.com/docview/2077327496?pq-origsite=summon

https://search.proquest.com/docview/2197364091/A58BF825101E47B2PQ/1?accountid=13605

https://search.proquest.com/docview/1668185726?pq-origsite=summon

https://www.dictionary.com/

Posted in biggarz, Portfolio Biggarz, Research | Leave a comment

biggarz-Casual rewrite

Think of the first reaction you’ll have when and if the government decides to raise the minimum wage. One could just picture it, blue skies, all smiles, and not a worry in the world. Well, not quite. More like unemployment sad to say. This right here is what we the people will have to deal with. Yes, there are benefits to this, but for this situation cons outweigh the pros. Take it from Alex Binkley, an Ontario farmer, “… January employment nationally fell by 88,000. Parttime employment declined by 137,000, while full-time employment rose by 49,000. The result was the unemployment rate increased by 0.1 percent to 5.9 per cent.” Even though this takes into account all of Canada, these numbers are scary. Just alone how fast that unemployment rate went up is concerning. Usually 4% is low in the U.S, but the U.S also have ten times greater the population as Canada which should also be taken into account. Truthfully, not everything can be of benefit to one’s own needs. Not only will unemployment will go up, but the younger lower skilled workers will never get hired again. To put it in economic terms from Brown, Gilroy Kohen, “Without a minimum wage, the monopsonistic employer’s marginal cost of labor everywhere exceeds the supply price.” One could say too that the owners were overall losing profit since they would have to pay their workers more. Furthermore, the main reason why businesses open is to make profit. Even though one could argue to create new jobs, however that would be wrong.

In addition to the unemployment numbers rising, and making our countries economy look bad. Another cause of the increase of wages would be inflation. And not talking about a dramatic change in the money values, but it would be noticable. For example take gasoline. Those prices constantly fluctuate for the past couple years, and if one takes notice it has started to increase a couple cents here and there. Another example from the Alberni Valley Times, “ferry rates go up April l. Why? The union employees receive their annual two per cent wage increase April l just like they every year from 2010 to 2014. In this world, you cannot have your cake and eat it too. Want to pay top wages to union employees? Then pay higher fares. That is called life.”It is a dog eat dog world and that’s how people make money. The government is like that and when there is a chance to make money from the people they’re going to take it. With some more economic terms the businesses with monopolies will take advantage since they own all that product and increase the price if there is inflation. It is scary to think that with the poverty already in this country we still want to raise the minimum wage to something absurd like $15 an hour. Granted yes, there should be change, but there is some opportunity cost to that. As little as it may seem each cent is increased there could be a potential person trying to support a family getting let go. It is the hard truths we face today as a society.

To tie both of these things together we see that the economic cons are more likely to outweigh the pros if there’s an increase. Not saying that it should not be increased a little, however there should be a line drawn to how far one goes. Into a smaller point the use of technology will see an increase in the workforce. Take franchises for example, McDonald’s. Most if not all the workers are on minimum wage. There has been a change where the restaurants now have self serve kiosks, which means no need for cashiers, cutting most jobs. As the Pittsburgh Tribune states, “f a machine can do for a cost of 7 per hour what a worker must be paid at least 7.25 per hour to do, the machine gets the job while the worker gets unwanted leisure.” The point being is these franchises want to make profit and the first thing owners look to cut is salaries. What better way to make money and to save time is to put a machine which the owner won’t have to worry about calling out of work, etc. Just think of how much money they’d save in both the long and short run.

Posted in biggarz, Causal Rewrite, Portfolio Biggarz | Leave a comment