Category Archives: X Stop Saw

Manufactures: According to the Power Tool Institute, “A low percentage of the 30,000 annual (U.S.) table saw injuries are due to contact with the blade.“ This is a definitional claim which argues that adopting the SawStop technology would not yield … Continue reading →

1. Who: Steve Gass Claim: “The blade has a sensor that detects electrical conductivity. A piece of wood is not very conductive, so the saw goes right through it. A salty, wet finger is conductive… that triggers the system.” This … Continue reading →

1. Manufacturers- Steve Gass stated, “The system can tell the difference between your finger and the wood.” This claim is a proposal claim. I find this very persuasive because it amazes me that technology has become so advanced that it … Continue reading →

1. Manufacturer: From: Ask me how I made this link, Marty.. “A low percentage of the 30,000 annual (U.S.) table saw injuries are due to contact with the blade – most are from kickback. ” This type of claim is … Continue reading →

1. Manufactures “A low percentage of the 30,000 annual (U.S.) table saw injuries are due to contact with the blade – most are from kickback.” This quote is taken from a website called Pro Tools Review.  http://www.protoolreviews.com/news/editorials/bosch-tools-sawstop-lawsuit This is a … Continue reading →

One of the claims made my manufacturer Steve Gass is a proposal claim.  Gass proposes that saws without Saw Stop technology result in thousands of injuries every year which is the main reason to buy his type of saws.  This … Continue reading →

1. “A low percentage of the 30,000 annual (U.S.) table saw injuries are due to contact with the blade – most are from kickback.” – From an article on Power Tools Institute report on mandating SawStop technology, found here: http://www.protoolreviews.com/news/editorials/bosch-tools-sawstop-lawsuit … Continue reading →

1. Manufacturers This claim is from the website :http://www.protoolreviews.com/news/editorials/bosch-tools-sawstop-lawsuit.  “A false trip mandates replacement of the brake mechanism which is an expensive piece (~$59)” This claim is a consequential claim. It tell you how a false trip will cause replacement … Continue reading →

1. Wec says his permanent and “traumatic injury” could have been prevented if Bosch and its competitors had not rejected and fought against the safety technology. 2. Ryszard Wec is claiming that if the new “flesh detecting technology” had been … Continue reading →

1. Steve Gass says, “…can tell the difference between your finger and the wood…” This is a definitional claim simply says exactly what the saw does. The saw’s technological safety device picks up electro-conductivity of flesh and stops the blade … Continue reading →