Wealth means success, and has been throughout history. One achieves wealth by holding a great amount of money. Since the beginning of time, humans have used physical currency for trade. Physical currency is simply an object that holds monetary value. What type of physical money is exchanged depends on the area in which you live. Some examples include stone or paper. In modern times, however, the physical form is becoming obsolete and society is using more electronic platforms such as apps and debit cards.
Milton Friedman’s, The Island of Stone Money, discusses their means of currency. Friedman is referring to the Micronesian’s German colony of the Caroline islands. More specifically, Friedman informs his audience of the Yap people, who reside in the island of Yap. Different from the US’s form of cash, or paper money, they used stone. On their island, they have no metal so they resort to stone. This medium of exchange goes by the name of fei. Fei, according to Friedman, “consists of large, solid, thick, stone wheels ranging in diameter from a foot to 12 feet, having in the centre a hole varying in size with the diameter of the stone, wherein a pole may be inserted sufficiently large and strong to bear the weight and facilitate transportation”(pg 3). Because of the size and weight of fei, their people rarely move the physical object and rely on acknowledgement of the transaction instead.
In the United States, citizens used gold as means of currency. Over time, people agreed that gold was inconvenient and it was replaced with paper, or cash. The process of this transformation consisted of gold backing the paper that people physically held. It is not that simple today, however. Jacob Goldstein looks further into the concept of modern day currency. Some questions arose including, “where did all that money go?” and “was there a big fire somewhere which burned up a lot of dollar bills?” when speaking of the stock market. While having a conversation with his aunt, she answers his questions by stating, “money is fiction.” To put it into simple terms, money can lose or gain value through inflation. With that being said, money is just an idea. Currently, we use electronic platforms to pay our bills, purchase objects online, etc… There’s no actual money being handed to one person to the next, they’re just numbers that go up and down in a system. Money is a concept created by people, changed by people, and traded by people. There is no concrete value of money, making it a confusing concept to comprehend.
Bitcoin is another example of how modern day money is just a concept. In Jeff Reeves, “Bitcoin has no place in your-or any-portfolio”, he argues that bitcoin is unreliable and nobody should participate in this digital currency. The reason behind this thinking is that bitcoin holds no true value and the only worth is based on how much someone is willing to pay. Reeves is correct in saying that it holds no value, but to say that nobody should get involved with bitcoin for that reason can be said the same about cash money. It is understood that money is just a concept, so there is little that differentiates the reliability and validity of cash money and bitcoin.
Friedman tells the interesting story of a wealthy Yap family. The family’s stone lay under the sea. An ancestor went to retrieve the stone but a storm arose. The team made it out of the storm, but the raft and the stone were left stranded. Even though the stone was not in the family’s possession, it was still accepted as if it were on land next to the family’s house. As Friedman states, “Unless you are very unusual, your immediate reaction, like my own, will be: ‘How silly. How can people be so illogical?’”(pg 5). Modern day currency can be looked at as just as illogical as the story of the Yap family. Their wealth was agreed upon the same way that wealth today is agreed upon. If cash money in the US isn’t backed by gold, and can lose or gain value, currency is just information…a concept that continues to shift with time.
It is mind boggling that money is such an essential aspect of our society yet it is all but reliable and understandable. From our society today in the US to the Yap people, currency is made up and holds no true value. As technology becomes more advanced, the future will not hold anymore physical currency and will all be digital. Monetary value will continue to diminish, further proving the idea that money is fictional.
Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” Diss. Hoover Institution, Stanford University , 1991.
Reeves, Jeff. “Opinion: Bitcoin Has No Place in Your – or Any – Portfolio.” MarketWatch, MarketWatch, 31 Jan. 2015, http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bitcoin-has-no-place-in-any-portfolio-2015-01-28.
The Invention of Money. 19 Feb. 2018, http://www.thisamericanlife.org/423/the-invention-of-money.
RowanRat, your Introduction is full of good ideas leading where exactly?
An essay about the value success places on the accumulation of wealth as the predominant measure of worthiness in the population? It turns out that’s not true.
An essay about the disconnect between the accumulation of cash and whatever else might have qualified as wealth, such as, for example, dominion over large territories? It turns out that’s not true.
A complete shift of focus. An essay about the primacy of carefully-curated objects as determinants of the ability to acquire goods and services? Maybe. You might be writing about that.
An essay about the purely symbolic nature of the coins, stones, shells, or paper notes that represent the ability to acquire goods and services? That could be one of your themes.
An essay about the surprisingly local nature of currency, which is valuable only among those who recognize and agree to its value? That would make a good 1000-word essay.
Other examples include casino chips, tea bricks (in India), clean urine (in prison), cigarettes (also in prison), bottlecaps (in Cameroon). That’s a fruitful subject for an essay.
If this is your actual thesis, I suggest you start here, RR. It’s rich, and requires no Pre-Introduction, and is much more likely to retain readers than all the other preliminaries.
Your new first sentence (suggested):
Your prediction might be wrong. Way wrong! Who cares!? It’s a Comp II college essay. But it’s bold, and dramatic, and anecdotal, and entertaining, and cuts through all the rest of the preliminaries to concentrate on your central theme: the rapid transformation of money into something totally intangible. I haven’t read your essay yet. Is that where you’re headed?
It had better be. It’s where your Introduction was headed. 🙂
Your transitions from gold-backed currency to “where did all the money go?” to money is just a fiction to “we use electronic platforms” to “there is not concrete value to money” are nearly impossible to follow, RowanRat, even for a reader very familiar with the original source material. They would be utterly impossible to follow without the background, and by not providing what your readers need to understand your claims, you’re neglecting your primary responsibility. One of them.
Your dispute with Jeff Reeves is well founded. I’ll bet he’s pretty despondent that he didn’t buy all the Bitcoin (which is trading today at $48,000 per coin) he could afford the day he made that stupid pronouncement.
In all I’ve read, the phrase “currency is just information” is the gem I would build an essay around, RowanRat. It’s beautiful. Worthy of 1000 words. And evidence that you are a good essay writer in the making.
I’ve graded your post at Canvas, RowanRat. No rewrite is required. But you may, for one week, respond to this feedback by revising your post for a Regrade. You will receive no further feedback since you didn’t request any before grading. But if you want to try your luck, make significant revisions and place this post into the Regrade Please category within one week starting now.