Stone Money- Thecommoncase

Modern Currency

The idea of the American Dream, or the idea of being financially stable, is something anyone can imagine for it’s been implemented into American culture for decades. Money is the biggest motivator for people today, and we praise the “hustlers” of the world for their work ethic and business savvy. But in today’s digitized world, how can materialistic wealth compare to numbers in your bank account, especially when you have never seen the cash with your own eyes? I learned about concepts of money from different countries, and the interesting ways something can represent money. In the most abstract sense, money doesn’t even exist, money never really belongs to any single person. Nowadays, money is a comforting illusion that simply helps keep important aspects of life organized, and encourages people to make more fictional money to grow the economy.

While listening to NPR’s podcast episode, “The Invention of Money”, I heard Ira Glass, the host of This American Life, and Planet Money producer Jacob Goldstein discuss their thoughts on the 2008 financial crisis, and explain where all that money could have gone. In reality, the money was simply worth less than it was. When the stock market crashed, no physical money was lost. Houses had lost their value “simply because that’s what everyone now agreed. No money changed hands, no many vanished.”  I can see how many factors come into play when determining the value of something, but it is difficult for me to understand how markets can lower in value, how everyone could come to agree on that, and not do anything to regulate it or stop it.

 Diving deeper into the concept of fictional money, Goldstein realized that in many systems of currency, there is an idea of how money is not a tangible commodity. This could be best explained by introducing the monetary practices of the people on an island called Yap. In Milton Friedman’s article The Island of Stone Money, he described that their currency was stone wheels that could weigh more than a car, and were only used for large, important purchases. The people of Yap did not have to bring the stone with them to know that it was theirs when they bought something. The person who “gave” them the stone had received what they wanted in return and did not have use for the stone wheel, so it does not harm anyone to leave it where it was. This counterintuitive system is comparable to the U.S. banking system prior to the 1930’s, when carrying around heavy gold pieces was becoming too tiresome. Instead of gold, Americans would carry around pieces of paper that could be exchanged for gold, which was kept in the vaults. 

But as for money in the 21st century, Goldstein states that, “… currency even now is like old-fashioned. You don’t have to touch money. You don’t have to see it. It’s just information.” This made me think about my own bank account and how much of my money I actually obtain. At any job I have had, I have used direct deposit because it’s simply more convenient. But in today’s world even paper checks can be scanned and deposited into your account through a banking app. Money in the 21st century is evolving digitally and blurring the definition of what it means to make and receive money, especially with new types of electronic currency.

Bitcoin is still new and confusing to the world. In the Yahoo News article “The Bubble Bursts on E-currency Bitcoin”, written by Anne Renaut, she says that the currency was made by an unknown programmer in 2009, who wished to create a currency that was free from any financial bank and be able to use that money anonymously. Since this was created in 2009, it seems clear that he created this after suffering through the financial crisis. Over the years it grew in popularity, and the prices were steadily moving up. Then in 2013, Bitcoin had it’s first serious crash. But Bitcoin foundation chief Gavin Andresen states that he “predicted the crash would not spell the end of the Internet-era currency.” He believes that with more time for its value to grow, Bitcoin will have a price that’s comparable to other currencies. 

The inner-workings of e-money is extremely complex, it is all made by intricate lines of code. “Mining” essentially adds transaction records to a page that anyone using a computer can access and make sure their transactions are accounted for. If Bitcoin was the main type of currency I was discussing in this essay, then I assume that complex lines of code would be the answer to questions like, “what is money?” or “where does my money go?” That explanation might be an easier way to comprehend how we exchange money. In a way Bitcoin shows proof that money is more tangible through coding. The bank takes the money in someone’s account and then lends that money to different people, but shows that person the number of how much money they think they have. I believe the future of currency is heading in this direction, but there are still vast improvements that need to be made and time to adjust to this large technological step. Though anonymity is appealing in some ways, European Central Bank claims it also could be a “monetary alternative for drug dealing and money laundering,” 

Though thinking about the concept of money in this way is tough to grasp, it has always been a detail that was part of the systems of currency for centuries. Today, money has been pulled apart and become an abstract concept of the money that is made but never seen. If the use of card payments and other forms of electronic payment continue to grow, Bitcoin might be in the somewhat far future if it becomes more stable. As long as people continue to make the economy grow and keep it from inflating, deciphering the exact definition money is incidental for now.

References

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” Diss. Hoover Institution, Stanford University , 1991.

Glass, I. (2018, February 19). The Invention of Money. Retrieved September 21, 2020, from https://www.thisamericanlife.org/423/the-invention-of-money

Renaut, A. (2013, April 13). The bubble bursts on e-currency Bitcoin. Retrieved September 21, 2020, from https://sg.news.yahoo.com/bubble-bursts-e-currency-bitcoin-064913387–finance.html

This entry was posted in Stone Money, thecommoncase. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Stone Money- Thecommoncase

  1. davidbdale says:

    You have an authoritative voice and a strong command of the material, commoncase. On my first reading, I’m very impressed. For the moment I’m just making brief comments to assure you I’m paying attention to your work (and depending on how many Conferences I hold on Friday, it could be awhile before I return for more detailed analysis).

    You can help us both out by asking specific questions about your own work. Do you prefer global “overall argument and organization” feedback? Maybe a critique of your argument style, mastery of logic and persuasion? Or a granular “proofreader” reaction to your grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure?

  2. davidbdale says:

    Commoncase, I understand you prefer overview feedback with an emphasis on argument and consistent tone.

  3. davidbdale says:

    YouR introduction contains a wealth of wonderful observations and information, CC, . . . much of it in conflict with itself. You could have started your paper with almost any sentence in this nice collection of openings. Look at it again and see how many angles you take to the material.

    1. Are you going to dispute the idea of financial stability? Yes, you probably are, considering you’re calling out money as pure fiction. So follow that lead.
    2. Are you going to focus on whether money is motivational, that work ethic is misplaced? Not really. So drop this.
    3. What is the value of this comparison between, I guess, things like houses and boats, to numbers in a digital account? And why the comparison to a fictional time when people were actually surrounded by their cash?
    4. The sudden appearance of “I learned about” will be weird to readers who don’t know you’re writing an essay about assigned readings. You can drop that reference and speak just to the material.
    5. Either money exists but doesn’t belong to one person, or it doesn’t exist at all. You can’t make both claims.
    6. Why nowadays? Was money ever anything but an illusion? It’s easier to tell now that we’ve divorced it from physical things, but I think your point will be that it’s always been fictional.

    Now, those are my reactions after a second reading. On the first, I was carried along by wave after wave of new observation, each one setting me up for a different sort of essay. Your challenge should always be to find the opening that suits your material, which is why introductions should always be written LAST.

    • davidbdale says:

      Your turn to Reply, cc.
      Would this sort of analysis be helpful to you on other paragraphs, or are you looking for something different?
      Put your post back into the Feedback Please category if you’re looking for more reactions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s